16
Warning: I chose the cheap agency over the mid-tier one and it cost me $2,800 in wasted ad spend
Last quarter I had to pick between a $500/month agency and a $1,500/month one for my e-commerce store (pet supplies, based in Austin). I went with the cheap one because I thought I was being smart with my money. They promised great results but all I got was generic templates and a lot of copy-paste work. After 3 months I had spent $2,800 on Google Ads with basically no sales to show for it. The account manager literally said "sometimes it takes time" when I asked about the lack of conversions. I finally switched to the pricier agency and they found 8 major tracking errors in the first week alone. Has anyone else trusted a low cost agency and regretted it like this?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
jamie79421h ago
Did the cheap agency ever show you their own portfolio of actual results before you signed up? I mean real case studies with numbers, not just "we helped a brand grow." A lot of these low cost shops just repurpose the same ad templates from their other clients and hope nobody notices. They barely set up proper conversion tracking either, which is basically flying blind. You're paying them to learn on your dime while the mid-tier crew already has systems in place.
4
thomas.cameron20h ago
Wait, 8 tracking errors in the first week? That's insane. The cheap agency basically had you throwing money into a black hole the whole time.
2