Loading…
2
Honestly, I witnessed a hiker cutting switchbacks on a rocky ascent yesterday and it's been on my mind. Is there ever a valid reason to leave the trail, or should we always stick to it to prevent erosion?
4 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In4 Comments
cameronf418mo ago
Referencing shane751's point about the baby bird, I've been pondering the cumulative effect of these well-intentioned departures. In heavily trafficked areas, even brief off-trail steps by numerous hikers can compact soil and damage root systems over time. For instance, on popular routes like the Appalachian Trail, frequent shortcuts to avoid mud or assist wildlife have created informal paths that exacerbate erosion. This isn't to dismiss emergencies, but rather to highlight how individual judgments, when multiplied, challenge the sustainability of managed trails. Perhaps the solution lies in better signage or designated wildlife corridors, so interventions don't compromise the trail integrity.
4
shane7518mo ago
What about emergencies that don't involve people? My buddy once had to leave a well-marked path because he spotted a baby bird out of its nest, right in the middle of the tread, with a hawk circling overhead. He stepped off exactly three paces, placed it gently under a nearby shrub its parents were chirping from, and stepped right back on. The whole thing took thirty seconds, but he still feels conflicted about those few feet of crushed grass.
1
shane7518mo ago
Honestly, your buddy did the right thing by acting quickly and minimizing his footprint. I've moved turtles off roads and always step just far enough to ensure their safety, then immediately return to the path. That brief departure is justified when it prevents harm to vulnerable animals!
6
tessa3878mo ago
Yeah that's totally fine, minimal impact for a good cause. Just gotta watch your step so you don't crush another nest on your way over, lol.
-1