Manual proofing at 2am finally met its match

I used to eyeball every client layout for typos, took 20 minutes a pop and I still missed things. Now I run a quick AI spellcheck tool that catches the same errors in 30 seconds, so I can actually sleep before launch day. Has anyone else handed over that repetitive QA step and found the output weirdly good, or is it just my low bar?

1 comments

1 Comment

gonzalez.vera22d ago

Wait, are you actually checking what the AI catches or just trusting it blindly now? Cause I tried one of those tools once and it flagged a client's name as a typo because it was a weird spelling. Got a good laugh out of it, but it also made me wonder how many real typos it would just sail past. When you say it catches the same errors, do you mean the ones you used to catch, or the ones you were missing too? Because those are two very different things when you're about to ship something to a client.